| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/02/2000 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/02/2000 |
|
Autoria: |
MIRANDA, C. H. B.; FERNANDES, C. D. |
|
Afiliação: |
Embrapa Gado de Corte (Campo Grande, MS). |
|
Título: |
Fixacao biologica de nitrogenio em estilosanthes (Stylosanthes spp.) |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1999 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: MOSTRA UNIDERP DE CIENCIA E TECNOLOGIA, 1., 1999, Campo Grande. Anais... Campo Grande: UNIDERP, 1999. |
|
Volume: |
v.1 |
|
Páginas: |
p.82-84. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
CNPGC. Resumo. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Brazilian savannas; Chapadao do Sul; Mato Grosso do Sul; Regiao Centro Oeste; Soils; Stilosanthes scabra; West Central Region. |
|
Thesagro: |
Cerrado; Fixação de Nitrogênio; Solo; Stylosanthes Guianensis; Stylosanthes Macrocephala; Stylosanthes Scabra. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Brazil; nitrogen fixation; Stylosanthes capitata. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01051naa a2200361 a 4500
001 1322549
005 2000-02-15
008 1999 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMIRANDA, C. H. B.
245 $aFixacao biologica de nitrogenio em estilosanthes (Stylosanthes spp.)
260 $c1999
300 $ap.82-84. v.1
490 $vv.1
500 $aCNPGC. Resumo.
650 $aBrazil
650 $anitrogen fixation
650 $aStylosanthes capitata
650 $aCerrado
650 $aFixação de Nitrogênio
650 $aSolo
650 $aStylosanthes Guianensis
650 $aStylosanthes Macrocephala
650 $aStylosanthes Scabra
653 $aBrasil
653 $aBrazilian savannas
653 $aChapadao do Sul
653 $aMato Grosso do Sul
653 $aRegiao Centro Oeste
653 $aSoils
653 $aStilosanthes scabra
653 $aWest Central Region
700 1 $aFERNANDES, C. D.
773 $tIn: MOSTRA UNIDERP DE CIENCIA E TECNOLOGIA, 1., 1999, Campo Grande. Anais... Campo Grande: UNIDERP, 1999.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Corte (CNPGC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpamt.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
23/05/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/02/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
GARRETT, R. D.; NILES, M. T.; GIL, J. D. B.; GAUDIN, A.; CHAPLIN-KRAMER, R.; ASSMANN, A.; ASSMANN, T. S.; BREWERM, K.; CARVALHO, P. C. de F.; CORTNER, O.; DYNES, R.; GARBACHK, K.; KEBREAB, E.; MUELLER, N.; PETERSON, C.; REIS, J. C. dos; SNOW, V.; VALENTIM, J. F. |
|
Afiliação: |
Boston University; University of Vermont; Boston University / Wageningen University; University of California; Stanford University; Agricultural Institute of Paraná; Federal University of Technology-Paraná; University of California; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS); Boston University; AgResearch; Point Blue Conservation Science; University of California; University of California; University of California; JULIO CESAR DOS REIS, CPAMT; AgResearch; JUDSON FERREIRA VALENTIM, CPAF-Acre. |
|
Título: |
Social and ecological analysis of commercial integrated crop livestock systems: Current knowledge and remaining uncertainty. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agricultural Systems, Amsterdam, v. 155, p. 136-146, July 2017. |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.05.003 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Crops and livestock play a synergistic role in global food production and farmer livelihoods. Increasingly, however, crops and livestock are produced in isolation, particularly in farms operating at the commercial scale. It has been suggested that re-integrating crop and livestock systems at the field and farm level could help reduce the pollution associated with modern agricultural production and increase yields. Despite this potential, there has been no systematic review to assess remaining knowledge gaps in both the social and ecological dimensions of integrated crop and livestock systems (ICLS), particularly within commercial agricultural systems. Based on a multi-disciplinary workshop of international experts and additional literature review, we assess the current knowledge and remaining uncertainties about large-scale, commercial ICLS and identify the source of remaining knowledge gaps to establish priorities for future research. We find that much is understood about nutrient flows, soil quality, crop performance, and animal weight gain in commercial ICLS, but there is little knowledge about its spatial extent, animal behavior or welfare in ICLS, or the tradeoffs between biodiversity, pest and disease control, greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation, and drought and heat tolerance in ICLS. There is some evidence regarding the economic outcomes in commercial ICLS and supply chain and policy barriers to adoption, but little understanding of broader social outcomes or cultural factors influencing adoption. Many of these knowledge gaps arise from a basic lack of data at both the field and system scales, which undermines both statistical analysis and modeling efforts. Future priorities for the international community of researchers investigating the tradeoffs and scalability of ICLS include: methods standardization to better facilitate international collaborations and comparisons, continued social organization for better data utilization and collaboration, meta-analyses to answer key questions from existing data, the establishment of long term experiments and surveys in key regions, a portal for citizen science, and more engagement with ICLS farmers. MenosCrops and livestock play a synergistic role in global food production and farmer livelihoods. Increasingly, however, crops and livestock are produced in isolation, particularly in farms operating at the commercial scale. It has been suggested that re-integrating crop and livestock systems at the field and farm level could help reduce the pollution associated with modern agricultural production and increase yields. Despite this potential, there has been no systematic review to assess remaining knowledge gaps in both the social and ecological dimensions of integrated crop and livestock systems (ICLS), particularly within commercial agricultural systems. Based on a multi-disciplinary workshop of international experts and additional literature review, we assess the current knowledge and remaining uncertainties about large-scale, commercial ICLS and identify the source of remaining knowledge gaps to establish priorities for future research. We find that much is understood about nutrient flows, soil quality, crop performance, and animal weight gain in commercial ICLS, but there is little knowledge about its spatial extent, animal behavior or welfare in ICLS, or the tradeoffs between biodiversity, pest and disease control, greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation, and drought and heat tolerance in ICLS. There is some evidence regarding the economic outcomes in commercial ICLS and supply chain and policy barriers to adoption, but little understanding of broader social outcomes or cultural fa... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultura sustentable; Crop-livestock systems; Desempeño animal; Integração lavoura-pecuária; Investigación agraria; Planificación de investigación; Rendimiento de los cultivos; Sistemas de cultivo y ganadería. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura sustentável; Pesquisa pecuária; Produção animal; Produção vegetal; Programa de pesquisa; Rendimento; Sociologia rural. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agricultural research; Animal performance; Crop yield; Research planning; Rural sociology; Sustainable agriculture. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03974naa a2200589 a 4500
001 2087338
005 2018-02-07
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.05.003$2DOI
100 1 $aGARRETT, R. D.
245 $aSocial and ecological analysis of commercial integrated crop livestock systems$bCurrent knowledge and remaining uncertainty.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aCrops and livestock play a synergistic role in global food production and farmer livelihoods. Increasingly, however, crops and livestock are produced in isolation, particularly in farms operating at the commercial scale. It has been suggested that re-integrating crop and livestock systems at the field and farm level could help reduce the pollution associated with modern agricultural production and increase yields. Despite this potential, there has been no systematic review to assess remaining knowledge gaps in both the social and ecological dimensions of integrated crop and livestock systems (ICLS), particularly within commercial agricultural systems. Based on a multi-disciplinary workshop of international experts and additional literature review, we assess the current knowledge and remaining uncertainties about large-scale, commercial ICLS and identify the source of remaining knowledge gaps to establish priorities for future research. We find that much is understood about nutrient flows, soil quality, crop performance, and animal weight gain in commercial ICLS, but there is little knowledge about its spatial extent, animal behavior or welfare in ICLS, or the tradeoffs between biodiversity, pest and disease control, greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation, and drought and heat tolerance in ICLS. There is some evidence regarding the economic outcomes in commercial ICLS and supply chain and policy barriers to adoption, but little understanding of broader social outcomes or cultural factors influencing adoption. Many of these knowledge gaps arise from a basic lack of data at both the field and system scales, which undermines both statistical analysis and modeling efforts. Future priorities for the international community of researchers investigating the tradeoffs and scalability of ICLS include: methods standardization to better facilitate international collaborations and comparisons, continued social organization for better data utilization and collaboration, meta-analyses to answer key questions from existing data, the establishment of long term experiments and surveys in key regions, a portal for citizen science, and more engagement with ICLS farmers.
650 $aAgricultural research
650 $aAnimal performance
650 $aCrop yield
650 $aResearch planning
650 $aRural sociology
650 $aSustainable agriculture
650 $aAgricultura sustentável
650 $aPesquisa pecuária
650 $aProdução animal
650 $aProdução vegetal
650 $aPrograma de pesquisa
650 $aRendimento
650 $aSociologia rural
653 $aAgricultura sustentable
653 $aCrop-livestock systems
653 $aDesempeño animal
653 $aIntegração lavoura-pecuária
653 $aInvestigación agraria
653 $aPlanificación de investigación
653 $aRendimiento de los cultivos
653 $aSistemas de cultivo y ganadería
700 1 $aNILES, M. T.
700 1 $aGIL, J. D. B.
700 1 $aGAUDIN, A.
700 1 $aCHAPLIN-KRAMER, R.
700 1 $aASSMANN, A.
700 1 $aASSMANN, T. S.
700 1 $aBREWERM, K.
700 1 $aCARVALHO, P. C. de F.
700 1 $aCORTNER, O.
700 1 $aDYNES, R.
700 1 $aGARBACHK, K.
700 1 $aKEBREAB, E.
700 1 $aMUELLER, N.
700 1 $aPETERSON, C.
700 1 $aREIS, J. C. dos
700 1 $aSNOW, V.
700 1 $aVALENTIM, J. F.
773 $tAgricultural Systems, Amsterdam$gv. 155, p. 136-146, July 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
